A federal choose in Detroit explained Friday that he will not reconsider his July dismissal of Typical Motors’ racketeering lawsuit against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

U.S. District Decide Paul Borman wrote in an view that new evidence introduced by GM concerning bribes and foreign lender accounts “is way too speculative to warrant reopening” the situation.

Borman also dominated that the previously dismissal of the situation was not completed in authorized error.

GM alleged that FCA applied foreign lender accounts to fork out bribes to former United Vehicle Workers Presidents Dennis Williams and Ron Gettelfinger, as very well as Vice President Joe Ashton. It also alleges that money was paid out to GM personnel which includes Al Iacobelli, a former FCA labor negotiator who was hired and later released by GM.

GM explained the payments had been manufactured so the officers would saddle GM with more than $1 billion in added labor expenditures.

“Even if the affidavits establish that these foreign lender accounts exist, that actuality does not increase to the inference innovative by GM, that FCA was more-than-very likely employing the lender accounts to bribe UAW officers,” Borman’s purchase said.

GM explained Friday that it would enchantment Borman’s ruling to the Sixth Circuit Court docket of Appeals.

“Today’s final decision is disappointing, as the corruption in this situation is confirmed offered the numerous guilty pleas from the ongoing federal investigation,” GM explained in a assertion. “GM’s fit will keep on — we will not accept corruption.”

FCA legal professionals wrote in courtroom documents that allegations it bribed union officers are “preposterous” and go through like a script from a “third-rate spy motion picture.”

Gettelfinger denied the allegations in a assertion and explained he experienced no foreign accounts. Williams’ California home was raided by federal brokers but he has not been charged. Iacobelli, who is awaiting sentencing in the federal corruption probe, also denied the promises.

“Judge Borman’s ruling this early morning when again confirms what we have explained from the starting — that GM’s lawsuit is meritless and its attempt to submit an amended complaint below the guise of asking the courtroom to improve its head was practically nothing more than a baseless attempt to smear a competitor that is profitable in the market,” FCA explained Friday in a assertion.

Relevant Video clip: